2007 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Isuzu I-350 would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2007 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Isuzu I-350 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. (166 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Isuzu I-350 (329 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. (226 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2007 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Isuzu I-350 | 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
Model | I-350 | Lancer |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 329 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2635 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |