2007 Jaguar XJ vs. 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJ (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (165 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJ (420 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (220 Nm). This means 2007 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jaguar XJ | 2005 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
Model | XJ | Grand Vitara |
Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 64 L |