2007 Jaguar XJ vs. 2013 GMC Sierra

To start off, 2013 GMC Sierra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 GMC Sierra (322 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2007 Jaguar XJ. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2007 Jaguar XJ.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 GMC Sierra (472 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Jaguar XJ. (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2013 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Jaguar XJ.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Jaguar XJ 2013 GMC Sierra
Make Jaguar GMC
Model XJ Sierra
Year Released 2007 2013
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4196 cc 5300 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 300 HP 322 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 420 Nm 472 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86.1 mm 96 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.3 mm 92 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5220 mm 5847 mm
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 2031 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1877 mm
Wheelbase Size 3170 mm 3645 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.7 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.1 L/100km 14.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 98 L