2007 Jaguar XJ8 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ8 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jaguar XJ8 weights approximately 289 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2007 Jaguar XJ8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Jaguar XJ8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jaguar XJ8 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XJ8 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2007 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2110 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2680 mm |