2007 Jaguar XJR vs. 1962 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJR is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJR (400 HP) has 292 more horse power than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJR (554 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jaguar XJR | 1962 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Jaguar | Reliant |
Model | XJR | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 2007 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 554 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2110 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 38 L |