2007 Jaguar XJR vs. 1977 Volvo 260
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJR is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJR (400 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 260. (146 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 260.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJR (554 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 260. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jaguar XJR | 1977 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJR | 260 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2662 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 554 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2110 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2660 mm |