2007 Jaguar XJR vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJR is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJR (400 HP) has 190 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Compass. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJR (554 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Compass. (319 Nm). This means 2007 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Jaguar XJR | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
| Model | XJR | Compass |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 554 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2110 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2660 mm |
