2007 Jaguar XJR vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee

To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJR (400 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (147 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.

Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJR (554 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Jaguar XJR 2005 Jeep Cherokee
Make Jaguar Jeep
Model XJR Cherokee
Year Released 2007 2005
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4196 cc 2776 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 400 HP 147 HP
Engine RPM 3500 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 554 Nm 360 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86.1 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.4 mm 100 mm
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Wheelbase Size 3170 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 70 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]