2007 Jaguar XKR vs. 1968 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XKR is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XKR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XKR (420 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 400 more horse power than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XKR should accelerate faster than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XKR (560 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 523 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Suzuki Fronte. (37 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XKR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Jaguar XKR | 1968 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | XKR | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 356 cc |
| Horse Power | 420 HP | 20 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 1970 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 66 L |
