2007 Jaguar XKR vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XKR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XKR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XKR (391 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (177 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XKR should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jaguar XKR weights approximately 740 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Jaguar XKR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Jaguar XKR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XKR (542 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (191 Nm @ 5250 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XKR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio. 2007 Jaguar XKR has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Jaguar XKR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jaguar XKR | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XKR | Clio |
Year Released | 2007 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 391 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 93 mm |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 222 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.6 seconds | 7.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |