2007 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2007 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Cherokee (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 2026 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2007 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jeep Cherokee | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Cherokee | Fronte |
Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2526 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2060 mm |