2007 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2007 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Cherokee (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 696 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jeep Cherokee | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jeep | Triumph |
Model | Cherokee | 2000 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1866 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 64 L |