2007 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2013 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2013 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Jeep Cherokee would be higher.
Because 2007 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Suzuki SX4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jeep Cherokee | 2013 Suzuki SX4 | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Cherokee | SX4 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 63 L |