2007 Jeep Commander vs. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2007 Jeep Commander is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Commander weights approximately 985 kg more than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 2007 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Jeep Commander 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Jeep Oldsmobile
Model Commander Cutlass
Year Released 2007 1988
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4699 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 228 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2305 kg 1320 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2680 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]