2007 Jeep Commander vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2007 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Commander (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (193 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1411 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Commander (510 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (280 Nm). This means 2007 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Jeep Commander | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | Commander | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2982 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 193 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 944 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 87 L |
