2007 Jeep Commander vs. 2009 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Commander (323 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Commodore.

Because 2007 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Commander (500 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2007 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore. 2007 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: