2007 Jeep Compass vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2007 Jeep Compass is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,967 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Compass (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Compass weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Compass (310 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2007 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Jeep Compass | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Compass | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1967 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2060 mm |
