2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (239 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (216 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 249 kg more than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee (510 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. (382 Nm). This means 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2004 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 239 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2169 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 85 L |