2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee (330 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 243 kg more than 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (509 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Armada |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 522 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2031 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 106 L |