2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 598 kg more than 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (510 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Jeep | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Phantom |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2031 kg | 2629 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5612 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1987 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1598 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 100 L |