2007 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2007 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2007 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jeep Wrangler | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Wrangler | Colt |
Year Released | 2007 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3778 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2360 mm |