2007 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2002 Lada Samara II
To start off, 2007 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lada Samara II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lada Samara II would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2002 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada Samara II.
Because 2007 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Lada Samara II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (322 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada Samara II. (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2007 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada Samara II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Jeep Wrangler | 2002 Lada Samara II | |
| Make | Jeep | Lada |
| Model | Wrangler | Samara II |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3778 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 322 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2470 mm |
