2007 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2007 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2007 Jeep Wrangler. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2007 Jeep Wrangler.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Jeep Wrangler. (321 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jeep Wrangler | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Wrangler | Armada |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3778 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 106 L |