2007 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,776 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 2007 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2007 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jeep Wrangler | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | 6 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3776 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 321 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 55 L |