2007 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2009 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda BT-50.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (330 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Jeep Wrangler. (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Jeep Wrangler.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Jeep Wrangler 2009 Mazda BT-50
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Wrangler BT-50
Year Released 2007 2009
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3778 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 202 HP 141 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 321 Nm 330 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.8 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 18.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4410 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1810 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 8.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 82 L 70 L