2007 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Jeep Wrangler would be higher.
Because 2007 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Countryman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2007 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Jeep | Mini |
| Model | Wrangler | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 321 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4097 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1993 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 47 L |
