2007 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Volvo C70
To start off, 2013 Volvo C70 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,777 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C70 (224 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2007 Jeep Wrangler. (205 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2007 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2007 Jeep Wrangler is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Jeep Wrangler. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (325 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo C70. (236 Nm). This means 2007 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | Wrangler | C70 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3777 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 224 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 236 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2640 mm |