2007 Kia Cee'd vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2007 Kia Cee'd is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2007 Kia Cee'd. (120 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2007 Kia Cee'd.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Kia Cee'd. (155 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Kia Cee'd | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cee'd | Raider |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.4 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 83 L |