2007 Kia Cerato vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2007 Kia Cerato is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Kia Cerato is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Kia Cerato (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Kia Cerato should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Kia Cerato weights approximately 736 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Kia Cerato, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Kia Cerato (146 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Kia Cerato will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Lotus Elan. 2007 Kia Cerato has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Kia Cerato will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Kia Cerato | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Kia | Lotus |
Model | Cerato | Elan |
Year Released | 2007 | 1964 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 72.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 166 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |