2007 Kia K2700 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2007 Kia K2700 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,665 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2007 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2007 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Kia K2700 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Kia K2700 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Kia | Triumph |
Model | K2700 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.1:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |