2007 Kia Optima vs. 1966 Seat 600
To start off, 2007 Kia Optima is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Kia Optima (162 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1966 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 600.
Because 1966 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Kia Optima (222 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Kia Optima | 1966 Seat 600 | |
Make | Kia | Seat |
Model | Optima | 600 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2359 cc | 765 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |