2007 Kia Optima vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2007 Kia Optima is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Kia Optima (162 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Kia Optima (222 Nm @ 4260 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Kia Optima | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Optima | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 222 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4260 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2420 mm |
