2007 Kia Optima vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Kia Optima would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2007 Kia Optima. (162 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2007 Kia Optima.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Kia Optima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Kia Optima. (222 Nm @ 4260 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Kia Optima | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Kia | Jeep |
Model | Optima | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4260 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2103 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2423 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |