2007 Kia Picanto vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Kia Picanto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Kia Picanto would be higher. At 1,086 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Kia Picanto is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Kia Picanto (64 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Kia Picanto should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Kia Picanto weights approximately 328 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Kia Picanto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Kia Picanto (99 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Kia Picanto will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano. 2007 Kia Picanto has automatic transmission and 2010 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2010 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Kia Picanto will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Kia Picanto | 2010 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Kia | Tata |
| Model | Picanto | Nano |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1086 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 154 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 928 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 37 L |
