2007 Kia Rio vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2007 Kia Rio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2007 Kia Rio. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2007 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1468 kg more than 2007 Kia Rio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Kia Rio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Kia Rio. (125 Nm @ 6500 RPM). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Kia Rio. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2007 Kia Rio has manual transmission. 2007 Kia Rio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Kia Rio | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Kia | Land Rover |
| Model | Rio | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1399 cc | 4396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.1 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 177 km/hour | 208 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1047 kg | 2515 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 100 L |
