2007 Kia Rondo vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Kia Rondo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,656 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Kia Rondo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Kia Rondo (182 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (177 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Kia Rondo should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Kia Rondo (247 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (191 Nm @ 5250 RPM). This means 2007 Kia Rondo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio. 2007 Kia Rondo has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Kia Rondo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Kia Rondo | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Kia | Renault |
Model | Rondo | Clio |
Year Released | 2007 | 2003 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2656 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.7 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 11.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |