2007 Kia Rondo vs. 2011 Ford E-250
To start off, 2011 Ford E-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Kia Rondo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Kia Rondo would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2007 Kia Rondo. (182 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2007 Kia Rondo.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-250 (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Kia Rondo. (247 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Kia Rondo.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Kia Rondo | 2011 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Kia | Ford |
Model | Rondo | E-250 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2656 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Flex Fuel |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 2154 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 125 L |