2007 Kia Sedona vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2007 Kia Sedona is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Kia Sedona (142 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Kia Sedona weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Kia Sedona (310 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. 2007 Kia Sedona has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Kia Sedona will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Kia Sedona | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Kia | Mazda |
| Model | Sedona | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2901 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 94 HP |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 19.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 179 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 57 L |
