2007 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2007 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Cougar. (129 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 755 kg more than 1966 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Land Rover Range Rover | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Land Rover | Mercury |
Model | Range Rover | Cougar |
Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4393 cc | 4728 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2117 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2830 mm |