2007 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2007 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 17 kg more than 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2007 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Land Rover Range Rover | 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Land Rover | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Range Rover | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4393 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2117 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 104 L | 109 L |
