2007 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2007 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2007 Land Rover Range Rover. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2007 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 628 kg more than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Land Rover Range Rover (390 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (344 Nm). This means 2007 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Land Rover Range Rover | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Land Rover | Mercury |
Model | Range Rover | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 4013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 390 Nm | 344 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2545 kg | 1917 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 104 L | 85 L |