2007 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Land Rover Range Rover (400 HP) has 252 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 2007 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Land Rover Range Rover (570 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2007 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Land Rover Range Rover | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Land Rover | Holden |
Model | Range Rover | Epica |
Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4197 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 570 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |