2007 Lincoln Mark LT vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2007 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2007 Lincoln Mark LT. (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2007 Lincoln Mark LT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 301 kg more than 2004 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Lincoln Mark LT (523 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 2007 Lincoln Mark LT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Lincoln Mark LT | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
Model | Mark LT | Armada |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 523 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 105.9 mm | 92 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2575 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 114 L | 106 L |