2007 Lincoln MKX vs. 2002 Renault Espace
To start off, 2007 Lincoln MKX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Espace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Espace would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Lincoln MKX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Lincoln MKX (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2002 Renault Espace. (162 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Lincoln MKX should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Espace.
Because 2007 Lincoln MKX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Renault Espace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Lincoln MKX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Lincoln MKX (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Espace. (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2007 Lincoln MKX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Espace.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Lincoln MKX | 2002 Renault Espace | |
Make | Lincoln | Renault |
Model | MKX | Espace |
Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 15.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 83 L |