2007 Lincoln MKX vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Lincoln MKX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Lincoln MKX would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2007 Lincoln MKX. (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2007 Lincoln MKX.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Lincoln MKX. (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Lincoln MKX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Lincoln MKX | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Lincoln | Jeep |
| Model | MKX | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 286 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2154 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1763 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 93 L |
