2007 Lincoln MKX vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Lincoln MKX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Lincoln MKX would be higher.
Because 2007 Lincoln MKX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Lincoln MKX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Lincoln MKX (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Lincoln MKX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Lincoln MKX | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Lincoln | Smart |
Model | MKX | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91.4 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 33 L |