2007 Lincoln Navigator vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2007 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Lincoln Navigator (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 2007 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2007 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Lincoln Navigator | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
| Model | Navigator | 3 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5300 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2000 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 55 L |
