2007 Lotus Exige vs. 1974 Mini MK III
To start off, 2007 Lotus Exige is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mini MK III would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Lotus Exige is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Lotus Exige (220 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1974 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Lotus Exige should accelerate faster than 1974 Mini MK III.
Because 2007 Lotus Exige is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Lotus Exige. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Mini MK III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Lotus Exige (225 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mini MK III. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2007 Lotus Exige will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mini MK III.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Lotus Exige | 1974 Mini MK III | |
Make | Lotus | Mini |
Model | Exige | MK III |
Year Released | 2007 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 847 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 61 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2040 mm |