2007 Mazda 3 vs. 1964 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2007 Mazda 3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda 3 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1964 Pontiac Tempest. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Pontiac Tempest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mazda 3 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1964 Pontiac Tempest. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Mazda 3 | 1964 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
| Model | 3 | Tempest |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2930 mm |
