2007 Mazda 5 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda 5 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2007 Mazda 5. (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda 5.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda 5 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Mazda | Citroen |
Model | 5 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |